Long overdue for one of these. Let's start with books, then move on to TV and movies, and finally, snacking.
Finished: A Fire Upon The Deep by Vernor Vinge (reread)
Okay, I've read this more than a dozen times already, and many of them while I was in the habit of writing up whatever I read for my LJ, so what else is there to say? This time I was reading it with an eye to preparing myself for the long-overdue sequel that just got released. Either way, I still love it.
Finished: Under the Dome by Stephen King
Stephen King's latest (well, latest that I've read or had much interest in reading), is a high-concept idea, about a small town that is enclosed in an impenetrable (aside from allowing a little airflow, and light and sound) force field by forces unknown.
Overall, I enjoyed it. King keeps up a pretty good pace, and it's fun to explore the idea and some of the consequences of it with him. There are some big flaws, which I'll explore in the spoilery section (which will be a little more spoilery than most of the times I do this... while I won't be revealing big secrets I'll be speaking in general about how certain plotlines ended).
The big question with King is always the ending. He does some great stories, but has trouble ending them in a satisfying way. In this case, there are two versions of the problem - the human level stories and the big idea. But to discuss that, we need to start the spoilery part of the review where we'll also go into some of the other flaws.
( Read more... )And one final non-spoilery complaint. If you are going to go to all the trouble of including a map at the start of your book... MAKE SURE IT MATCHES THE BOOK ITSELF. On several occasions, the town (and therefore the Dome) is described as being shaped a little like a sock. So, naturally, we get a map of a square/rectangular area with no indication on whether this is a subset of the dome, or the dome is a subset of it (the dome itself is unmarked). Only a few landmarks are pointed out, and often when I looked up a road that was mentioned in the book, so I could see where some events were happening in relation to others, no such road was on the map, so either it was under the dome but not on the area of the dome the map covered, or it was in the area of the map but just left off as unimportant. It was INCREDIBLY frustrating. I'd rather have had no map and just have to guess at everything instead of being teased with the prospect of having an idea of where everything takes place and not really having any clue.
Still, overall, I liked it and might read it again sometime, but probably not for a few years at least. Apparently there is already a miniseries adaptation in the works for one of the US cable networks, and I'll probably watch it, too, if nothing else there are a couple of cool visuals that would be fun to see actually visual.
Finished: The Clockwork Rocket by Greg Egan
You might remember me ranting on this book before... not the book itself, which had a novel premise that really intrigued me, but rather the price in a bookstore, compared to what was listed on the jacket. But my interest in the book outweighed my rage, especially when I found the online price was quite reasonable (almost half the bookstore price), so I broke down and ordered it.
The concept that interested me was exploring a world essentially based on a single change in the fundamental equations of geometry, a plus sign turned into a minus sign. We were promised a world where plants get energy by creating light, and where if you travelled fast enough time would stop on earth while generations passed for you. Those ideas still hold, but it got a little more complicated. I was expecting a more-or-less human society to explore these strange properties, but instead Egan created an alien race that was very different in many ways. I was disappointed at first, but eventually got into it.
The book's not perfect, though. In particular, I think it was written for somebody a lot smarter than me. I wanted the science to be a bit of a backdrop, invisibly informing the world and letting us look at it from the perspective of someone who took it for granted. Instead, we got some of that, certainly, but there was a lot of long and highly technical explanations, with charts, graphs, and diagrams, of how the science worked (some of the characters being scientists who are discovering these ideas themselves or teaching them to other scientists in class), things like how light looked to observers or geometry interacts with time. And although I struggled hard to grok them at first, eventually I started to glaze over and pretty well skip them without even trying to understand, and just trying to grasp what key point they were getting across.
On the whole I'm not disappointed I read it, but it wasn't what I wanted, either. A tiny bit more spoilery (nothing big but might ruin the joy of discovery of how the world and people work through the narrative) behind the cut about the good parts and bad
( Read more... )This is listed as book one of a series, so the ultimate question is, would I read book 2? I think I would, but barely, and I wouldn't buy it new in hardcover, I'd be willing to wait for paperback or if I could find it used for a good price.
Finished: A Deepness in the Sky by Vernor Vinge (reread)
Another multiple reread while I was preparing for Children of the Sky. Deepness doesn't (at least, as far as I can determine so far) directly relate to Children, DitS and FutD connect by virtue of being in the same universe and having one character in common, but take place thousands (or hundreds of thousands) of years apart in a whole different part of the galaxy. But again, I've read it so often that there's not much to say. I will say this, although I probably wanted to see more of the world/area of the galaxy of A Fire Upon the Deep (although don't get me wrong, I'd
love to see a sequel to Deepness in any number of possible plot threads and would buy the hell out of it), Deepness provided more surprises and emotional gut-punches that I still feel every time I read it.
Started: The Children of the Sky by Vernor Vinge
Started: Dark Light by Ken Macleod
Okay, that's it for book foo, time to move on to TV and movies...
TV, of the continuing shows, well, plenty are still holding my attention but not wowing me, and a few are trending towards losing all my interest (Supernatural, I'm looking at you. I spent half the last episode silently screaming BULL&%# because of the crap you pulled in the episode before), only The Walking Dead still gets me excited to see it every week (although it's dragging on compared to last year, I think they could have done more this number of episodes in... and seriously, can that extended search end already?).
Of the new shows?
Person of Interest: Lost my interest with the second episode. Well, really with the first, but I thought I'd give it one more just in case it suffered from pilot-itis.
Terra Nova: I'm watching, but I don't think I'd care if everybody in it except the grizzled camp-leader got eaten by tyrannosaurs. And it was only 2 episodes in before they pulled out an old SF plot that every show eventually does when it gets old, so I don't have high hopes for it to get better. If they do a 'time loop only one person remembers from loop to loop' (a la Window of Opportunity, Cause and Effect, and of course, Groundhog Day) episode this year, I'm out.
Once Upon a Time: For the life of me I can't imagine why they approved this, aside from 'the people from Lost did it'. Nor can I imagine it succeeding, but apparently it's already been picked up for a full season so apparently my imagination's lacking. It seems pretty cheesy overall, especially the fairy-tale-flashbacks, and where it isn't cheesy, it's often dull. I'm still watching, but right now it's in the 'watching a train wreck' spirit. But I'm trying to keep an open mind, maybe they'll win me over.
Grimm: It's... okay. I want to like it more than I do, given that the producers did Angel, but the lead's a little flat and the plots feel a little weak so far. The reformed Big Bad Wolf character is pretty much the only reason I watch. But I'll keep watching for a while longer.
I think those are the only new ones I tried. If I left one out, it's probably because I just didn't care.
So, let's move on to movies. Superhero movies, specifically. Recently I've watched:
X-Men: First Class: Quite enjoyed it. It wasn't perfect (Emma Frost in particular was TERRIBLE), and some of the choices of mutants used and lack of attention to continuity or character rankled (the minor details and inconsistencies don't matter so much, but I don't think it's out of place to want, say, Havok to actually be Scott's brother in an X-men movieverse and not some random mutant in the 60s) but overall, I thought it was a lot of fun, and certainly better than X-3, which should just be completely ignored.
Captain America: The First Avenger: Captain America is one of those characters I never really cared for. But I figured I'd give the movie a try. And, it was fun, for what it was... I certainly enjoyed it, but at the same time, if it's not the kind of movie where, if I died just before seeing it, I'd say "Damn, I didn't get to see Captain America!". Wait, that just describes my expectations... well, if I knew my reaction in advance, then I certainly wouldn't. Okay, how about this. If a magic genie came to me and offered me, not even one of my big wishes, but something of moderate value, in exchange for wiping all my memories of seeing the movie and a magic spell preventing me from ever watching it, I would probably take that deal. It was fun but kind of forgettable.
One minor problem was that the movie ended pretty much exactly where the only thing I find interesting about Cap begins - the 'man out of time, adjusting to a modern world' aspect. I would have loved that to be half the movie, but I know that's meant for the sequels and Avengers and probably would have objectively weakened the movie overall.
Green Lantern: Okay, I think the reviews I heard trashing it are probably a little over the top (except perhaps if it's by die-hard fans), but at the same time, there definitely was something missing, and at the same time they seemed to try to cram too much. I think the movie would be better served without a lot of the setup (we don't really need a lengthy explanation of who formed the Green Lanterns, what Parallax is, and so on at the beginning, we can learn it along with the character), a threat that isn't the "ultimate threat to all green lanterns ever" or taking place mostly off Earth.
Batman: Year One (animated): Well-produced, I think, but at the same time it felt like 'just another Batman origin story'. Possibly because other such stories borrowed heavily from it. I've never read the original book/series, so there was no joy of seeing it come to life. But all in all? If we had to do another Batman animated movie, I'd have skipped Year one and have squeed much more to see Batman: No Man's Land adapted. Or heck, even just Cataclysm - Batman vs an Earthquake. Really, practically anything that includes some of the characters like Spoiler, Cassandra Cain, Oracle, and to a degree, Huntress, rather than JUST the characters from the beginning of the lore over and over and over and over and over and over again.
And I think that's it. Again, if I saw any other movies, they obviously didn't make much of an impression.
And finally, snacking. Every year, President's Choice (the 'store brand' that somehow became a national brand) seems to introduce a couple new brands of chips. I found one of my favorites (greek, with feta and olive) this way, so unless they sound vile, I always want to give their new ones a try. This year they seem to have "Peppercorn Steak" and, in their slightly less fancy variety "Loads of" (where they claim to offer far more seasoning on their chips than average chips), "Jalapeno Poppers", basically Jalapeno and cheese.
The first is a little better than I expected. I probably won't put it into regular rotation, but I think I would eat it again. The second is a bit more complicated. It's certainly good, for jalapeno chips, I'll give them that... I'll probably eat them again from time to time (They're not as good as kettle-cooked jalapeno ones, but better than jalapeno-cheese Doritos). However, the problem is, they talked a really big game about how hot and spicy it is. In fact, they had FIVE chili-peppers in a row and the words "Scorching Hot" on the bag. And it just... wasn't. It was a two chili-pepper heat at best.
They are making a mockery of the chili-pepper rating system for hotness. It undermines the whole system when you do that.. So because I was expecting an intense experience and just got a mild pleasurable one, I have to consider myself disappointed.